Application of multi criteria decision making process for assessment of sustainable business in mining companies

Slavica Miletić; Dejan Bogdanović; Džejn Paunković; Dragan Mihajlović

doi:10.5937/ror1601015M

Autori

Slavica Miletić Mining and Metallurgy Institute, Bor, Serbia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4526-4715
Dejan Bogdanović University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty, Bor, Serbia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4871-4366
Džejn Paunković Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-7612
Dragan Mihajlović John Naisbitt University, Faculty of Management, Zaječar, Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ror1601015M

Ključne reči:

Višekriterijumsko donošenje odluka, održivo poslovanje, rudarske kompanije

Apstrakt

Cilj rada je da se ukaže na značaj višekriterijumskog donošenja odluka radi procene primene i napretka održivog poslovanja rudarskih kompanija. Procena održivosti utvrđuje se na bazi uspešnosti realizacije najvažnijih aspekata održivog poslovanja. Polazeći od toga, u ovom radu je izvršeno rangiranje ekonomskih, socioloških, ekoloških i kultoroloških aspekata održivog poslovanja. Za rangiranje navedenih aspekata održivog poslovanja korišćena je višekriterijumska analiza-Electre metoda. Dobijeni rezultat identifikuje najvažnije aspekte održivog poslovanja, a sve u u cilju određivanja da li je održivo poslovanje rudarskih kompanija izbalasirano podjednako ili ne i koji od ovih aspekata nedostaje.

Reference

Blancas, F.J., Caballero, R., González, M., Lozano-Oyola, M., Pérez, F. (2010) Goal programming synthetic indicators: An application for sustainable tourism in Andalusian coastal counties. Ecological Economics, 69(11): 2158-2172

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.016

Floridi, M., Pagni, S., Falorni, S., Luzzati, T. (2011) An exercise in composite indicators construction: Assessing the sustainability of Italian regions. Ecological Economics, 70(8): 1440-1447

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.003

Hofstede, G. (2001) Cultures consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

Hosseini, H.M., Kaneko, S. (2011) Dynamic sustainability assessment of countries at the macro level: A principal component analysis. Ecological Indicators, 11(3): 811-823

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.10.007

Munda, G. (2005) "Measuring Sustainability": A Multi-Criterion Framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1): 117-134

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-003-4713-0

Neumayer, E. (2003) Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham, UK - Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar

Paunković, J. (2014) Educational programs for sustainable societies using cross-cultural management method. in: Global Sustainable Communities Handbook: Green Design Technologies and Economics, pp. 387

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397914-8.00016-3

Paunković, J. (2013) Building learning soceites for sustainability-cross-cultural management approach. Recent Researches in Applied Economics and Management, 2, pp. 149

Shmelev, S.E., Rodríguez-Labajos, B. (2009) Dynamic multidimensional assessment of sustainability at the macro level: The case of Austria. Ecological Economics, 68(10); 2560-2573

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.019

Shmelev, S.E. (2011) Dynamic sustainability assessment: The case of Russia in the period of transition (1985-2008). Ecological Economics, 70(11): 2039-2049

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.003

Štrbac, N., Vuković, M., Voza, D., Sokić, M. (2012) Sustainable development and environmental protection. Reciklaža i održivi razvoj, vol. 5, br. 1, str. 18-29

Štreimikienė, D., Baležentis, A. (2013) Integrated Sustainability Index: the Case Study of Lithuania. Intellectual Economics, 7(3): 289-303

https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-13-7-3-02