Model for evaluating municipal waste management system applying the LCA - Part II: Model verification

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ror1901053C

Keywords:

life cycle assessment (LCA), municipal solid waste, life cycle inventory model (IWM-2), life cycle impact assessment method (Impact2002+)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use the life cycle assessment (LCA) instrument to assess the different municipal solid waste (MSW) management scenarios for the South Bačka region. LCA has proven to be a very effective instrument for identifying strategies that minimize negative environmental impacts. A comparative analysis is very important for decision makers and planners in the waste sector. This paper presents the application of the LCA model described in the Part I of this study. This model combined life cycle inventory model (IWM2) and life cycle impact assessment method (Impact2002+) to compare and evaluate the municipal solid waste system with the purpose of identifying environmental benefits and disadvantages, as well as the economic cost of defined scenarios of waste management systems that could be implemented. The model was applied to a regional municipal waste management system in South Bačka (The Republic of Serbia). Four scenarios of waste management are defined. The scenarios include the combination of different treatments of waste (biological and thermal), and a sanitary landfill. The results show clear differences between the scenarios in the selected indicators and quantify the relative advantages and disadvantages of different waste management scenarios. The model is a useful tool to support decision-makers to choose the technology of solid municipal waste treatment. Also, the participants in the planning of solid waste management will enable a better understanding of the importance of LCA method. Finally, it will help the improvement of the strategic planning process in the field of environmental protection, without which it is impossible to achieve the concept of sustainable development in the AP Vojvodina.

References

Arena U., Mastellone M.L., Perugini F., The environmental performance of alternative solid waste management options: a life cycle assessment study, Chemical Engineering Journal, 96, 2003, 207-222,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2003.08.019

Banar M., Cokaygil Z., Ozkan A., Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey, Waste Management, 29 (1), 2009, 54-62,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006

Cherubini F., Bargigli S., Ulgiati S., Life Cycle Assessment of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration, Energy, 34, 2009, 2116-2123,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.023

Council Directive 99/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, entered into force on 16.07.1999., Official Journal of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, 182/1-19,

Directive 2004/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004, amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, Official Journal of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, 47/26-31,

Eriksson O., Carlsson Reich M., Frostell B., Bjorklund A., Assefa G., Sundqvist J.O., Granath J., Baky A., Thyselius L., Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 2005, 241-252,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.018

EU Thematic Strategy, Report from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on the Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste, 2005, Brussels,

https://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/Progess%20report.pdf, 14.03.2016.,

Hong J., Li X., Zhaojie C., Life cycle assessment

of four municipal solid waste management scenarios in China, Waste Management, 30 (11), 2010, 2362-2369,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.038

Liamsanguan Ch., Gheewala S.H., LCA: A decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems, Journal of Environmental Management, 87, 2008, 132-138,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.003

Lombardi L., Carnevale E., LCA approach for comparing different possibilities of energy production from waste: landfill gas recovery and waste-to-energy, Proceedings International Conference on Life Cycle Management, 2nd ed., Barcelona, September 2005, 5-7, 202-207, Editors: Castells P. F., Rieradevall P. J., Publisher: Castells P.F., ISBN 846-09-6564-3,

Official Gazette of RS, No. 88/2010, Law of Nature Protection, http://www.zzps.rs/novo/kontent/stranicy/propisi_zakoni/z%20o%20zastiti%20prirode%2010.pdf, 07.09.2017,

Stanisavljevć N., Ubavin D., Batinić B., Fellne J., Vujić G., Methane emissions from landfills in Serbia and potential mitigation strategies: a case study, Waste Management and Research, 30 (10), 2012, 1095-1103,

https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12451867

Stepanov J., Model for evaluating municipal waste management system applying the method of life cycle assessment, (Dissertation), University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad, Serbia, 2018, 133,

Stypka, T., Flaga, A., Application of the integrated waste management model (IWM-1) into the decision process, Institute of Heat Engineering and Air Protection, Cracow University of Technology, 2005, 73-84,

http://www.energiomiljo.org/kth/Polishproject/rep14/Stypka14p73.pdf,

Thorneloe S. A., Weitz K., Jambeck J., Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management, Waste Management, 27 (8), 2007, 1006-1020,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.024

Villeneuve J., Michel P., Fournet D., Lafon C., Menard Y., Wavrer P., Guyonnet D., Process-based analysis of waste management systems: A case study, Waste Management, 29 (1), 2009, 2-11,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.008

Wittmaier, M., Langer, S., Sawilla, B., Possibilities and limitations of life cycle assessment (LCA) in developmnet of waste utilization system - Applied examples for a region in Northern Germany, Waste Management, 29 (5) , 2009, 1732-1738.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.11.004

Downloads

Published

15-12-2019

Issue

Section

Articles